Issue & Reproduction Steps

Expected behavior: Mustache syntax must work in the pmql field

Actual behavior: Mustache syntax does not work in the pmql field

Solution

• Filters were added to resolve mustache syntax notation in Record List control with Collections data source

How to Test

1. Go to server https://develop-qa.processmaker.net/ or any PM4 environment
2. Create a form screen
3. Add a line input
   • Change the variable name to other (e.g. option)
4. Add a record list
   • Select collection option in the Source of Record List field
   • Select any collection in the Collection Name field (or in other column name from the selected collection)
   • Add a value like data.form_input_1 = "test 2" in the pmql field
   • Select Single field of record option in the Data Selection field
   • Select id option in the Column field
   • Display all columns in the columns accordion
5. Press Preview button
   • The record list is displayed according to condition data.form_input_1 = "test 2"
6. Change the value data.form_input_1 = "test 2" to data.form_input_1 = "{{option}}" in the pmql field
7. Press Preview button
8. Write test 2 in the line input

Related Tickets & Packages

• https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-25270
• https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-25194

Code Review Checklist

• I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
• This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
• This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
• This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
• This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
• This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
• This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
• This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
• This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.